(1) The Greeks believed it was wrong to eat the dead, whereas the Callatians believed it was right to eat the dead. (2) Therefore, cating the dead is neither objectively right nor objectively wrong. It is merely a matter of opinion that varies from culture to culture. Or, alternatively: (1) The Eskimos see nothing wrong with infanticide, whereas Americans believe infanticide is immoral. GEC: ETHICS-TED 30
Home
/
(1) The Greeks believed it was wrong to eat the dead, whereas the Callatians believed it was right to eat the dead. (2)
Answer:
The statements you've provided seem to discuss cultural relativism and moral differences across societies. The implication is that different cultures hold contrasting beliefs about certain actions, such as eating the dead or infanticide. These examples are often used to illustrate the concept that morality can be culturally relative, meaning that what is considered morally acceptable or unacceptable can vary from one culture to another.
In the context of the first statement:
- The Greeks and Callatians have differing views on whether eating the dead is right or wrong.
- The conclusion drawn is that the morality of such an action is subjective and dependent on cultural perspectives.
In the context of the second statement:
- The Eskimos and Americans have contrasting attitudes towards infanticide.
- The argument suggests that morality is not universal but rather shaped by cultural norms and values.
Both statements highlight the concept of cultural relativism, which suggests that moral judgments are influenced by cultural context and societal norms. This perspective challenges the notion of absolute or objective morality and acknowledges that what is considered right or wrong can vary across different societies.