1.Professor Noel has a copy of the original chronicles of Pigafetta brought to their museum. However, upon criticizing the document.he noticed that it talks about the journey of Vasco de Gama in India. What type of criticism did the professor use on the historical source?Why?
2. Mr. Santos excavated Japanese WWII military equipment somewhere in Lupon, Davao Oriental. To authenticate the said discovery, what criticism should he use and why?
3. Dr. Palma discovered the various communication codes of the Reformed Armed Forces during the 1987 coup. However, he was not sure if these were really during the coup attempt. What type of criticism should he use to validate this source?
4. Mr. Cerbo has been researching the experiences of the Philippine Scout Rangers members in the Battle of Marawi. What criticism should he apply to prove that his participants fought the war?
5.Ms.Paleguin is a Museum Curator. She received artifact donations from a private collector last month. These artifacts were labeled as Manobo weapons discovered during the early 1900s. Before displaying them in the museum, she must first authenticate these objects. What criticism should she apply?
Share
Answer:
1. Professor Noel used source criticism in his evaluation of the chronicles of Pigafetta. Source criticism is a method used to determine the authenticity and reliability of historical sources by examining their origin, purpose, context, and content. Professor Noel was examining the historical accuracy of the chronicles and evaluating its claims about the journey of Vasco de Gama in India.
2. Mr. Santos should apply artifact criticism in order to authenticate his discovery of Japanese WWII military equipment. Artifact criticism is a method that evaluates the physical characteristics of artifacts to determine their authenticity and provenance. This type of criticism will help Mr. Santos determine whether the equipment he found is truly from the Japanese military during WWII and if it was indeed excavated in Lupon, Davao Oriental.
3. Dr. Palma should apply internal criticism in order to validate the communication codes he discovered as being used during the 1987 coup. Internal criticism is a method that evaluates the consistency and credibility of a source by examining its internal content and structure. This type of criticism will help Dr. Palma determine the validity of the codes as being from the Reformed Armed Forces during the coup attempt.
4. Mr. Cerbo should apply oral history criticism to prove that his participants fought in the Battle of Marawi. Oral history criticism is a method that evaluates the accuracy and reliability of oral history accounts by examining the context, perspective, and biases of the sources. This type of criticism will help Mr. Cerbo determine the veracity of the experiences of the Philippine Scout Rangers members in the Battle of Marawi.
5. Ms. Paleguin should apply artifact criticism to authenticate the artifact donations she received. Artifact criticism is a method that evaluates the physical characteristics of artifacts to determine their authenticity and provenance. This type of criticism will help Ms. Paleguin determine the authenticity of the Manobo weapons labeled as having been discovered during the early 1900s.