D owes C P1,000,000.00 due on December 12, 2021. On December 12, 2021, D fails to pay and requests C for extension up to December 31. C asks D to execute a promissory note that D will pay on December 31. D was hesitant to execute a promissory note, but when C said “Pag di ka gumawa ng promissory note, kakasuhan kita sa court sa utang mo!” Thus, out of fear of a court case, D was constrained to execute the promissory note. Is the promissory note executed by D voidable on the ground of threat or intimidation?
Share
The promissory note executed by D may be voidable on the ground of threat or intimidation. Under Philippine law, a contract is voidable if it is entered into as a result of threat, intimidation, or undue influence.
In this case, it appears that D was threatened with a court case if he did not execute the promissory note. This constitutes a threat, which could make the promissory note voidable if D can show that he was forced to sign it because of the threat.
It is important to note that in order to have a valid contract, both parties must enter into it freely and willingly, without any form of coercion or undue influence. If one party is forced to enter into a contract under duress, the contract may be considered voidable.
If D wishes to challenge the validity of the promissory note on the grounds of threat or intimidation, he would need to bring this matter to court and provide evidence to support his claim. The court would then decide whether the promissory note is voidable based on the circumstances of the case.