Historical sources that were not written shouldn't bw used in writing history, true or false?
Share
Historical sources that were not written shouldn't bw used in writing history, true or false?
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Answer:
False. Historical sources that were not written can still be valuable and used in writing history. While written sources such as documents, letters, diaries, and official records are commonly relied upon by historians, they are not the only sources available for studying the past.
Non-written sources, also known as material or archaeological sources, can provide important insights into historical events, cultures, and societies. These sources include artifacts, buildings, artwork, tools, pottery, bones, and other physical remains. They can offer direct evidence of past human activities, practices, and beliefs.
Material sources can complement and enhance written sources by providing a more holistic understanding of the past. They can help fill gaps in the historical record, shed light on aspects of daily life, provide evidence of cultural practices, and offer clues about social, economic, and technological developments.
For example, the study of ancient civilizations often relies heavily on archaeological findings, such as ruins, pottery, and artifacts, to reconstruct their history. Similarly, the examination of fossils and geological formations can provide valuable information about prehistoric life and the Earth's history.
However, it is important to note that interpreting non-written sources can be challenging. They often require specialized knowledge and expertise to analyze and understand their significance. Additionally, the context in which these sources are found and the methods used to excavate and preserve them are crucial for their accurate interpretation.
In summary, while written sources are commonly used in historical research, non-written sources can also play a significant role in understanding and writing history. Both types of sources should be considered and evaluated in order to gain a comprehensive understanding of the past.
Explanation:
Hope it help