Read Andy Weir's short story titled "The Egg". Write a short philosophical essay reflecting on at least three lines or questions that you consider philosophical. You may use the follwoing as guide in writing your essays: a. State the gist of the story. b. Identify the lines that you find philosophical. Every line or question must have adequate explanation or reason for your belief. State your general impression of the story. What interest you most in the story. C. state your general impression of the story. what interest you most in the story.
Home
/
Read Andy Weir's short story titled "The Egg". Write a short philosophical essay reflecting on at least three lines or questions that you
Verified answer
Reflection
This short article of Weir conveys a striking philosophical editorial on the idea of mankind and how it approaches relational connections.
"The Egg" draws on the longstanding human, and artistic, question of "What occurs after death?" painting an idealistic depiction for a definitive destiny of the human populace. The anonymous male hero, returning to his better half and kids, bites the dust abruptly in a mishap and appearances a discussion with "the omnipotent." However, this "unclear power figure," unperturbed, clarifies that the hero has carried on with many lives previously, and he will be resurrected into every one of the lives on earth from an earlier time, present and future — in the end even those of his significant other and kids — until he develops enough to enter this present reality.
What appears to be most unpretentiously splendid about this work is its capacity to give platform to a particularly fascinating interpretation of a profound inquiry. In his restricted measure of room, Weir focuses towards the maintenance of a self-character even across various life expectancies just as a discourse on the maybe discretionary principles of the real world. He performs multiple tasks, all while rousing perusers to consider the honestly solipsistic see that maybe their each sacrificial activity in fact helped an adaptation of themselves.
Then again, I discovered surprising excellence in its casual, effectively receptive composition, which attracts me as it leaves the inventive parts of narrating for the most part to the crowd. Weir once in a while utilizes any word other than "said" to portray the discussion of the two primary figures, picking rather to zero in on his intriguing thoughts. Additionally, the utilization of viewpoint likewise parts from custom, in that the main individual viewpoint is given to the exceptional figure, and the subsequent individual "you" for his conversation accomplice straightforwardly puts the peruser inside the story. While perusing, it seems like I am inside the story and it makes for a really captivating, philosophical thought of his words. All things considered, imagine a scenario in which I were in his circumstance.
There is such a lot of contained in the quickness of the piece that I wind up scrambling to consider every one of the viewpoints that have influenced me so. For instance, the composed response to the hero's question, "what is the significance of life," comes up short on a dull end, as it is just a basic articulation of saying "for you to develop." But who is the you, and what's the significance here to develop? Does it truly matter, considering the unexpected development halfway through the story?
On the off chance that each human is just a past or next resurrection of simply the one being, then, at that point each activity — rough or tranquil — was done to oneself, myself or yourself in the event that we follow the line of thought in the story. With each achievement, similar to Abraham Lincoln, and each disappointment, similar to the professional killer John Wilkes Booth, the highs and lows of each individual life thus fuel a huge shared mindset, maybe emblematic of the inexorably globalized world or the inward soul of creativity got from all mankind. Or on the other hand maybe I am simply guessing — who can say for sure?
#BRAINLYFAST